Re: RFR: 8275170: Some jtreg sound tests should be marked headful

On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 16:45:15 GMT, Phil Race wrote: > This makes the tests eligible to be run on headful systems. In practice it > seems like ONLY headful systems actually have the sound devices. The sound > keyword isn't understood by anything yet, so adding headful is the only way > we have r

Fix AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration next to throw NoSuchElementException instead of NullPointerException

I have a small PR to fix a bug in AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration - details are in the PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6095 (Note: I'm already an OpenJDK contributor and have signed an OCA but don't have an author account to be able to create bugs) Thanks, -Andrew

Re: RFR: 8275170: Some jtreg sound tests should be marked headful

On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:01:27 GMT, Phil Race wrote: > This fix adds "headful sound" keywords to a number of javax/sound jtreg tests > > The jtreg javax.sound tests are written in such a way that if a needed audio > device > or other platform resource is not available, they just exit with a "pass

Re: RFR: 8153490: Cannot setBytes() if incoming buffer's length is bigger than number of elements we want to insert. [v6]

> Fix `SerialBlob.setBytes(long pos, byte[] bytes, int offset, int length)` in > the following cases: > > 1. `pos - 1 + bytes.length - offset > this.length() && pos - 1 + length <= > this.length()` >The original implementation throws `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException` but > this case should e