On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:02:31 GMT, Daniel Le wrote:
> Locale.filterTags methods ignore actual weight when matching "*" (as if
> it is 1) because LocaleMatcher.{filterBasic,filterExtended} do so.
>
> Fix the bug and add regression test cases for it as well as existing
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:18:17 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Daniel Le has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address most review comments
>>
>> - Include "// change to low
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:33:55 GMT, Daniel Le wrote:
>> Locale.filterTags methods ignore actual weight when matching "*" (as if
>> it is 1) because LocaleMatcher.{filterBasic,filterExtended} do so.
>>
>> Fix the bug and add regression test cases for it as well a
> Locale.filterTags methods ignore actual weight when matching "*" (as if
> it is 1) because LocaleMatcher.{filterBasic,filterExtended} do so.
>
> Fix the bug and add regression test cases for it as well as existing
> behavior.
Daniel Le has updated the pull reque
Locale.filterTags methods ignore actual weight when matching "*" (as if
it is 1) because LocaleMatcher.{filterBasic,filterExtended} do so.
Fix the bug and add regression test cases for it as well as existing
behavior.
-
Commit messages:
- Locale.filterTags must respect the weight of
