On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:03:48 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Patch adds the planned support for new vector operations and APIs targeted
> for [JEP 426: Vector API (Fourth
> Incubator).](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280173)
>
> Following is the brief summary of changes:-
>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:06:24 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> would a jep unneeded be enough to "unstuck" this PR?
Yes if no bug. Conceptually, the `/jep unneeded` will behave as no jep command.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7888
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:24:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 425: Virtual Threads (Preview); TBD which
>> JDK version to target.
>>
>> We will refresh this PR periodically to pick up changes and fixes from the
>> loom repo.
>>
>> Most of the new mechanisms in the
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:10:57 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-424 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjd
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:07:23 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Please review this PR which aims to optimize the implementation of the
>> `toString` method we provide for records. A benchmark comparing the
>> implementation we are providing for records with lombok found out that
>> lombok is much f
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 19:38:07 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Given changes in JLS 9.6.4.1, JDK-8261610 in Java SE 17, the statements
>> about annotation applicability made in java.lang.annotation.Target need to
>> be updated to match.
>>
>> Please also review the corresponding CSR:
>> https://bugs.o
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:36:17 GMT, Rémi Forax
wrote:
>> Looks like I've found the original ticket:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193031
>
> Apart from the @SuppressWarnings, this looks good to me.
> And i like the irony of this.
Hi all,
According to the document of
[SafeVarargs
