Peter Levart peter.levart@... writes:
I see that (given Function f, g), f.compose(g) means: f⨟g, rather than
f∘g. Would mathematicians complain?
For what it's worth, Scala has andThen for f;g and compose for f∘g.
Best,
Ismael
Joe Darcy joe.darcy@... writes:
One of my long-term goals is to finish the
small matter of programming [2] to port FDLIBM from C to Java, which
would immunize the JDK from this class of problem.
In case people are not aware, FastMath from Apache commons-math is a
pure Java implementation:
Andrew Haley aph@... writes:
The post on
http://www.exploringbinary.com/java-hangs-when-converting-2-2250738585072012e-
308/
Also see (filed more than a year ago):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
Best,
Ismael
Ismael Juma mlists@... writes:
Also see (filed more than a year ago):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
Oops, some of the newer messages were not visible on my reader for some reason.
Sorry for the noise.
Ismael
Hey all,
The approach used for Arrays in Scala was changed in 2.8 and initially
java.lang.reflect.Array.get/set was used in certain cases. That was changed at
the end of last year[1] after it was pointed out that the performance of those
methods was less than desirable[2].
The interesting
Hi Paulo,
Paulo Levi i30...@... writes:
http://www.mail-archive.com/core-libs-dev-0nJqbsLSQw0FDOXUYO6UHQ at
public.gmane.org/msg02147.html
From the email you mention:
I'm not convinced that they are enough better to commit.
To me that sounds like it's not going in at all.
Ismael
Hey Vladimir,
Vladimir Yaroslavskiy vladimir.yaroslavs...@... writes:
You are right, the arrays were different: int array was 2'000'000
and Integer array was 200'000 (and test was run 50 times) - if I
remember correctly.
Great, that makes sense.
Now I've run test on the same length
Hi Doug,
In a previous message you said:
There are a few remaining things to consider
before taking this too seriously as a replacement.
I'll be out for 10 days starting tomorrow so probably
won't get a chance to do so soon.
I now understand the secret behind your productivity levels... somehow
