't see that HotSpot/C2 is
> actually intrinsifying this constructor. The signature is used for
> some pattern matching in the legacy stringopts.cpp code, though. So
> the trivial fix should help a bit.
>
> Thanks
> Claes
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8
According to openjdk/jdk [1] current copy-constructor of String class does
not copy the value of hashIsZero field which may lead to 0-hash being
recalculated on copy even if it is known to be 0.
Could you please tell me if I am right with this point or if this behaviour
is intentional?
If this is a
Hi there, I've seen that javax.annotation.processing.AbstractProcessor
overrides `Processor#process(..)` method without any changes to it [1]:
- it still is abstract
- signature is untouched
- javadoc is untouched
Is this done intentionally or this redundant override can be eliminated?
[1]:
https:
