, Nasser Ebrahim
, core-libs-dev Libs ,
"i18n-...@openjdk.java.net"
Date: 09/27/2018 01:55 AM
Subject:Re: RFR: JDK-8211161: java.lang.ArithmeticException:
divide by zero from java.text.DecimalFormat.format()
Hi, Nasser, Joe,
I agree with Joe as to the assessment on DecimalF
can change the
component of this bug. Please comment.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: joe darcy
To: Nasser Ebrahim , core-libs-dev Libs
Date: 09/26/2018 10:29 PM
Subject:Re: RFR: JDK-8211161: java.lang.ArithmeticException:
divide by zero from java.text.DecimalFormat.format(
.
Kindly request you to review and comment.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
Sure Magnus. Thank you for your suggestion.
Once am ready with the prototype, I will initiate the infrastructure
related discussion to build-...@openjdk.java.net and continue the
streamlining of the extended charsets related discussion here.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Magnus Ihse
if you have any inputs.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Alan Bateman
To: Nasser Ebrahim ,
core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net, Xueming Shen
Date: 08/06/2018 12:08 AM
Subject:Re: Adding new IBM extended charsets
On 24/07/2018 09:56, Nasser Ebrahim wrote:
Thank you Martin, Sherman
fix is available at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aleonard/IBM1129/webrev.00/
Kindly request you to review the webrev and provide your comments.
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201540
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202329
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
ning the bug for this issue.
I will wait for your response on the other thread and proceed as per your
inputs.
Regards,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Alan Bateman
To: Nasser Ebrahim , Xueming Shen
, core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date: 08/01/2018 05:45 PM
Subject:Re: Add x-IBM-1129 char
Thank you Sherman for reviewing the webrev and approving the changes. Can
you please create a bug to proceed further.
Regarding the other two charsets, IBM964 and IBM33722, we will analyze
further to see whether it can be better implemented.
Regards,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Xueming Shen
so that openjdk can start on all locales for
AIX-platforms.
Once we decided the approach for IBM charsets on jdk.charsets in the other
discussion thread, we can move all the IBM charsets (including these two
new ones) to the new location. Hope that is acceptable. Please advise.
Thank
. Kindly request
you to open a bug and review the changeset. Please let me know if you have
any questions.
> The webrev of the fix is available at
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aleonard/IBM1129/webrev.00/
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
PS: Thank you Ichiroh for the testing and review.
IBM charsets from
jdk.charsets to a different module jdk.ibm.charsets and enable them only
for AIX platform by default. We can consider removing them from JDK in
future if community found them as an overhead or not adding value.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Alan Bateman
modules as
jdk.ascii.charset and jdk.ebcdic.charset. Then, depends upon the platform,
we can consider including either of the charset module or both.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Alan Bateman
To: Nasser Ebrahim , Xueming Shen
, core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date
rt working towards creating a
separate charset provider/module for IBM charsets in JDK. Please advise.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Xueming Shen
To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date: 07/05/2018 10:14 PM
Subject:Re: Adding new IBM extended charsets
Sent by:"c
supported platforms.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Florian Weimer
To: Nasser Ebrahim , Java Core Libs
Date: 07/04/2018 07:11 PM
Subject:Re: Adding new IBM extended charsets
On 07/04/2018 02:41 PM, Nasser Ebrahim wrote:
> Please share your thoughts on your prefer
the level ourselves for LTS releases as we may not want to change the
specification in a service stream.
Please share your thoughts on your preferred option and list out any other
options which I missed out. Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Nasser Ebrahim
en a bug and review the fix. Please let me know if
you have any questions.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
asking each end user to add
to the white list.
Please clarify whether there is any reason for not adding the standard JDK
classes by default to the white list as they are trusted code.
Thank you,
Nasser Ebrahim
From: Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>
To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.ja
17 matches
Mail list logo
