the driver being loaded manually and
through the Service Provider mechanism which causes the dysfunction.
Regards,
Robert
On Friday, 3 April 2015, 14:07, Robert Gibson wrote:
Thanks Alan,
Note that the repro given in my mail is a bit simpler than the current defect
description, especially if
Thanks Alan,Note that the repro given in my mail is a bit simpler than the
current defect description, especially if you don't have access to the "MyFace"
JDBC driver.Regards,Robert
On Friday, 3 April 2015, 13:04, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/04/2015 10:33, Robert Gibson wr
Hi there,
We are doing some early testing with JDK 9 and have discovered that the changes
made to java.sql.DriverManager back in November/December have introduced an
incompatibility with our JDBC driver (that we have used unchanged since Java 6)
when it is pre-loaded with Class.forName (as reco
Sorry about that, let's blame my crappy webmail ;)
(Strange that the patch appears fine in the mail archives and the webrev?)
Robert
On Thursday, 18 September 2014, 3:18, Alan Bateman
wrote:
On 17/09/2014 21:48, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Hello bad characters,
>
> Issue:https://bugs.openjdk
Thanks for the bug report,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 9/9/2014 1:30 AM, Robert Gibson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I came across a case in BigDecimal division where the dividend ends up
>> getting mutated, which is rather strange for a seemingly
ide could cause a problem
> in setScale.
>
> Thanks for the bug report,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 9/9/2014 1:30 AM, Robert Gibson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I came across a case in BigDecimal division where the dividend ends up
>> getting mut
Hi there,
I came across a case in BigDecimal division where the dividend ends up getting
mutated, which is rather strange for a seemingly immutable class! (It's a
subset of the cases where the Burnikel-Ziegler algorithm is used, I haven't
done the analysis to find out under which exact condi
