wrote:
>
>> Hi Shinya,
>> Thnx. I will update it.
>> Regards,
>> Nadeesh
>> On 2/3/2016 5:41 PM, ShinyaYoshida wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nadeesh,
>>> Almost LGTM!(But I'm not a reviewer;) )
>>> However I've noticed that you don't
Hi Nadeesh,
Almost LGTM!(But I'm not a reviewer;) )
However I've noticed that you don't use NANOS_PER_SECOND at L1223 and L1246.
Is there some reason not to use it?
Regards,
shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
2016-02-01 15:18 GMT+09:00 nadeesh tv :
> Hi all,
>
> Please review following
>
> Bug Id : https
from that department to an empty
> {@code Set}. If a stream {@code filter()} operation were done instead,
> there would be no mapping for that department at all. »
>
> s'marks
>
>
>
>
> On 12/8/15 4:21 AM, ShinyaYoshida wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>> Thank you
dEmployeesByDeparetment/wellPaidEmployeesByDepartment
>
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
>
>
> 2015-12-08 13:04 GMT+01:00 ShinyaYoshida :
> > Thank you so much!
> > I've updated in webrev.02.
> >
> > Best regard,
> > shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
> >
>
Thank you so much!
I've updated in webrev.02.
Best regard,
shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
2015-12-08 20:25 GMT+09:00 Paul Sandoz :
>
> > On 8 Dec 2015, at 10:59, ShinyaYoshida wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> > Thank you for your review.
> > (Especially, about doc com
filtering(e ->
> e.getSalary() > 2000, toset(;
>
>
> (Since we don’t specify the monetary units, it is left as an exercise to
> speculate whether this is well paid or not :-) ).
>
>
> 472 * @param filter a predicate to be applied to the input elements
>
still necessary and useful for other situations.
Regards,
shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
2015-12-04 15:57 GMT+09:00 ShinyaYoshida :
> Hi, core-libs-dev and Brian, Paul,
> I'd like to propose adding filtering method to Collectors.
>
> When I consider the operation what is "grouping the
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your answer.
I've just updated my webrev to use 9:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shinyafox/8144675/webrev.01/
Regards,
shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
2015-12-07 17:31 GMT+09:00 Paul Sandoz :
>
> On 7 Dec 2015, at 03:45, ShinyaYoshida wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I&#x
Hi,
I'd like to wait for the review, but I have a trivial question:
Which @since is preferred, 1.9 or 9?
For ex, at Optional#or and stream, @since 9 is used.
On the other hand, at Collectors#flatMap, @since 1.9 is used.
Regards,
shinyafox(Shinya Yoshida)
2015-12-05 22:18 GMT+09:00 Paul Sandoz
rs#filtering): http://ideone.com/83Lzb7
filtering before collecting(Stream#filter): http://ideone.com/EmTrXE
Regards,
shinyafox(ShinyaYoshida)
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:57 PM, ShinyaYoshida wrote:
> >
> > Hi, core-libs-dev and
Hi, core-libs-dev and Brian, Paul,
I'd like to propose adding filtering method to Collectors.
When I consider the operation what is "grouping the number of employees
whose income is over 2000 by the depertment from employees", we have to
write following because there is no way to filter for Collec
11 matches
Mail list logo
