I am sorry if my comment would be inappropriate, but is there a reason not to
introduce "Optional ifAbsent(Runnable emptyAction)" and change signature of
ifPresent to "Optional ifPresent(Consumer consumer)"?
In that case method chaining would be more natural and it will give a decent
way to ha
Hi Iris,
Do you consider an option to let community reuse JDK versioning style for their
own purposes. Probably defining an interface with basic default methods which
can be extended by various libraries to provide unified way to gather version
information from MANIFEST.MF, ClassLoader's jars a
g
like:
LOG.error("An error occurs: " + e.getMessage()).debug("Print stack trace: ", e);
Regards,
Victor Polischuk
is implemented).
However, I totally agree that the "chaining" feature should be done as a
compiler time AST modification to allow using legacy APIs without recompilation
and keep byte-code, existing APIs and various conventions untouched.
---
Regards,
Victor Polischuk
--- Orig
e. I
have not found any mentions in JEPs and just wonder if the idea is rejected or
still somewhere in pipeline for Java 1.x. (or perhaps it is just waiting to be
filed by someone in brand new JEP).
---
Regards,
Victor Polischuk
r libraries will be used.
In their turn lib users do not know details of implementation of a stack they
are using. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible to avoid leaks in the setup
and ThreadLocal leaks one of them because (talking of PermGen/Metaspace leaks)
it's absolutely unknown to the library when an application/plugin/module is
going to be unloaded.
Sincerely Yours,
Victor Polischuk
cular references - I believe that the fix should be applied to the
issue with ThreadLocal.
Please let me know what do you think of it.
Sincerely Yours,
Victor Polischuk
for (int i=s.length(); i 0)
for (int i = digits - s.length(); i > 0; i -= 63)
sb.append(i > 63 ? zeros[63] : zeros[i]);
Regards,
Victor Polischuk
--- Original message ---
From: "Brian Burkhalter"
Date: 19 June 2013, 22:59:03
> Continuing on from this th
Excuse me for asking something stupid but do empty appends in
"com.sun.tools.hat.internal.model.JavaValueArray" make any sense?
result.append("").append(val);
//Victor
--- Original message ---
From: "Ot�vio Gon�alves de Santana"
Date: 7 June 2013, 16:20:02
> Inefficient use StringBuffer
ecify type parameters for each
enum value independently.
Sincerely yours,
Victor Polischuk
--- Original message ---
From: "Joe Darcy"
Date: 30 May 2013, 09:44:57
> Hello Victor,
>
> On 5/29/2013 11:25 PM, Victor Polischuk wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I beg
};
private Color(String color) {...}
public boolean filter(T pixel) {...}
public T make() {...}
}
//--
Thank you in advance.
Sincerely yours,
Victor Polischuk
e() {...}
> };
private Color(String color) {...}
>
>
public boolean filter(T pixel) {...}
>
>
public T make() {...}
}
> //--
Thank you in advance.
>
>
>
Sincerely yours,
>
Victor Polischuk
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
