Thanks Naoto!
Is there a separate ticket for the translation to other locales?
Letu
On 12/4/19, 12:36 PM, "naoto.s...@oracle.com" wrote:
Looks good, assuming the change between 03 and 04 is to fix "no new line..."
Naoto
On 12/4/19 11:38 AM, Yang,
Hi Naoto,
Can you review and approve the webrev? Thanks!
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xliu/8234288/webrev.04/
Letu
On 11/23/19, 6:09 PM, "naoto.s...@oracle.com" wrote:
Looks good.
Naoto
On 11/22/19 9:55 PM, Yang, Letu wrote:
> Hi Naoto,
&
Fixed in https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xliu/8234288/webrev.04/ Thanks!
From: Martin Buchholz
Date: Monday, November 25, 2019 at 10:27 AM
To: "Yang, Letu"
Cc: "core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net" ,
"i18n-...@openjdk.java.net" ,
"naoto.s...@oracle.com"
Hi Naoto,
Added it in the new webrev https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xliu/8234288/webrev.03/
. Thanks!
Letu
On Nov 22, 2019 4:40 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Letu,
You might want to add lines for "Turkey" zone as well in LocaleData?
Naoto
On 11/22/19 4:16 PM, Yang, Letu w
to
On 11/20/19 9:43 PM, Yang, Letu wrote:
> Hi Naoto,
>
> Thank you for the suggestions!
>
> I've added a new webrev:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xliu/8234288/webrev.01/
>
> Letu
>
> On 11/18/19, 9:09 AM, "naoto
ucingChangeset.html
On 11/17/19 8:54 PM, Yang, Letu wrote:
> Hi Naoto,
>
> Thank you for the clarification!
>
> Xin from my team has filed a JBS and uploaded my webrev:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234288
> https://c
Please go ahead and fix the issue in English resource. As to the
translation, Oracle l10n will translate it in appropriate locales.
Naoto
On 11/15/19 5:56 PM, Yang, Letu wrote:
> Hi Naoto
>
> Thank you for the quick response! We will file a
Hi,
We recently found an issue with the Time Zone name for “Europe/Istanbul” and
"Asian/Istanbul". Since Turkey moved to their own Turkish Time (TRT) zone in
2016, although the tzdata had been updated, the Time Zone name string has not
been updated yet:
Thanks for the suggestion! I've submitted a new CR to security-dev. The new CR
is at https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xliu/8229958/01/webrev/ I've run all tier-1
tests again with the change.
Letu
On 8/21/19, 12:39 AM, "Alan Bateman" wrote:
On 21/08/2019 08:32, Yang, Letu wrote
nd regards,
Ivan
On 8/20/19 10:18 PM, Yang, Letu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the fix of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229958
where I made the change to allow majority of calls don't have to acquire the
locks when checking the availability of the Provi
Hi,
Please review the fix of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229958 where
I made the change to allow majority of calls don't have to acquire the locks
when checking the availability of the Provider object. Similar effort had been
made in fixing
11 matches
Mail list logo
