Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-16 Thread Igor Ignatyev
thanks for confirming that Joe. -- Igor > On Dec 16, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Joe Wang wrote: > > > > On 12/12/19 10:46 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: >> @Joe/Lance, >> were there any reasons why you needed to switch jtreg's requiredVersion back >> to 4.2b13 in jaxp? are there any reasons which prevent

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-16 Thread Joe Wang
On 12/12/19 10:46 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: @Joe/Lance, were there any reasons why you needed to switch jtreg's requiredVersion back to 4.2b13 in jaxp? are there any reasons which prevent jaxp from switching to jtreg4.2b16 now? I don't recall any specific reason, if any. It would be fine

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-16 Thread Severin Gehwolf
Hi Jon, On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 08:47 -0800, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > I've been trying to contact AdoptOpenJDK folk about this and other > related issues. I've not heard back yet. It's tracked at AdoptOpenJDK via: https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-build/issues/1445 Thanks, Severin

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-13 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
I've been trying to contact AdoptOpenJDK folk about this and other related issues. I've not heard back yet. In the meantime, I note that these days it is reasonably easy for folk to build jtreg if they do not have easy access to the latest prebuilt binaries. There's a README in the root of

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-13 Thread Igor Ignatyev
Hi Kumar, I haven't heard adoptopenjdk people bringing it up. I agree w/ your hypothesis, this job started to fail after https://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg/rev/deee95d5d8ff which checks that '.hg' directory exists in

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-13 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hey Igor — please read inlined comment below….. [cc’ed Jon] On Dec 12, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Igor Ignatyev mailto:igor.ignat...@oracle.com>> wrote: On Dec 12, 2019, at 10:21 PM, David Holmes mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>> wrote: Hi Igor, On 13/12/2019 3:19 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote:

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-12 Thread Igor Ignatyev
> On Dec 12, 2019, at 10:21 PM, David Holmes wrote: > > Hi Igor, > > On 13/12/2019 3:19 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8235866/webrev.00 >>> 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod >> Hi all, >> could you please review this small patch which updates TEST.ROOT

Re: [14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-12 Thread David Holmes
Hi Igor, On 13/12/2019 3:19 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8235866/webrev.00 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod Hi all, could you please review this small patch which updates TEST.ROOT in all test suites to require jtreg4.2b16? 8230067[1] updated profiles

[14] RFR(S/T) : 8235866 : bump jtreg requiredVersion to 4.2b16

2019-12-12 Thread Igor Ignatyev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8235866/webrev.00 > 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod Hi all, could you please review this small patch which updates TEST.ROOT in all test suites to require jtreg4.2b16? 8230067[1] updated profiles to use jtreg4.2b16, but didn't update TEST.ROOT files.