Re: [9] RFR 8055251: Re-examine Integer.parseInt and Long.parseLong methods

2014-09-10 Thread Remi Forax
On 09/10/2014 01:55 PM, Claes Redestad wrote: On 09/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 05/09/2014 14:03, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, I'm requesting reviews and a sponsor for these changes to the recently added parse methods (8041972), suggested during discussions on net-dev: bug: https:/

Re: [9] RFR 8055251: Re-examine Integer.parseInt and Long.parseLong methods

2014-09-10 Thread Claes Redestad
On 09/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 05/09/2014 14:03, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, I'm requesting reviews and a sponsor for these changes to the recently added parse methods (8041972), suggested during discussions on net-dev: bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055251 webrev

Re: [9] RFR 8055251: Re-examine Integer.parseInt and Long.parseLong methods

2014-09-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/09/2014 14:03, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, I'm requesting reviews and a sponsor for these changes to the recently added parse methods (8041972), suggested during discussions on net-dev: bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055251 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/805525

[9] RFR 8055251: Re-examine Integer.parseInt and Long.parseLong methods

2014-09-05 Thread Claes Redestad
Hi, I'm requesting reviews and a sponsor for these changes to the recently added parse methods (8041972), suggested during discussions on net-dev: bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055251 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8055251/webrev.1/ discussion:http://mail.openjdk.j