Roger,
I have changed impl according to your comments, thank you!
Regarding fc-extension, I am not able to add comments in the bug tracker I
think you can do it, correct? Also I am already in OCA list.
diff --git a/src/java.base/unix/classes/java/lang/ProcessImpl.java
Hi Andrey,
Sorry to be slow in getting back to this.
Thanks for the update; did you notice that Windows has a separate
implementation of
ProcessImpl and would also need a similar, though not identical
toString() implementation?
Hi Roger,
Thank you for reviewing it! I've prepared another version.
diff --git a/src/java.base/unix/classes/java/lang/ProcessImpl.java
b/src/java.base/unix/classes/java/lang/ProcessImpl.java
--- a/src/java.base/unix/classes/java/lang/ProcessImpl.java
+++
Hello,
I have added toString() method in Process.java.
diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
@@ -548,5
Hi Andrey,
Since toString is a public method it needs to provide complete javadoc
specification
as providing values for debugging information. ToString methods
typically directly
reflect the state of the fields of the object.
Why should the exitValue have the value of the pid if the process
Hello,
I have added toString() method in Process.java.
diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java
@@ -548,5
