Hi Miran,
On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Miroslav Kos wrote:
> On 20/11/15 15:25, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> On 20/11/15 09:43, Miroslav Kos wrote:
>>> Locally, it worked for me, but I understand that it's dengerous - global
>>> state is evil ... I removed all the
On 20/11/15 09:43, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Locally, it worked for me, but I understand that it's dengerous - global
state is evil ... I removed all the scenarios modifying JDK/conf/ dir -
I just commented out those parts so if necessary, it can be uncommented
and run locally.
On 20/11/15 15:25, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 20/11/15 09:43, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Locally, it worked for me, but I understand that it's dengerous - global
state is evil ... I removed all the scenarios modifying JDK/conf/ dir -
I just commented out those parts so if necessary, it can be uncommented
Locally, it worked for me, but I understand that it's dengerous - global
state is evil ... I removed all the scenarios modifying JDK/conf/ dir -
I just commented out those parts so if necessary, it can be uncommented
and run locally.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8131334/jdk.02/
Thanks
On 11/19/2015 12:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/11/2015 18:36, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Miran,
I would expect this to fail horribly - you may not have the
right to create anything under $JAVA_HOME/conf - it may even
be a read-only file system... And I would be very uneasy as this
may have
Hi Lance,
I added jtreg test(s) -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8131334/jdk.01/index.html
There are several scenarios being tested, all without/with SM.
The test preparation I am doing in java (based on test args), so the
test creates/deletes $JAVA_HOME/conf/jaxm.properties.
Hopefully
On 19/11/2015 18:36, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Miran,
I would expect this to fail horribly - you may not have the
right to create anything under $JAVA_HOME/conf - it may even
be a read-only file system... And I would be very uneasy as this
may have side effects on tests executing later on if
On 19/11/15 18:31, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi Lance,
I added jtreg test(s) -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8131334/jdk.01/index.html
There are several scenarios being tested, all without/with SM.
The test preparation I am doing in java (based on test args), so the
test creates/deletes
.. anyone?
On 10/11/15 15:31, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Ping ... Would somebody find time for this one?
Thanks
M.
On 26/10/15 13:59, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'd like to ask you for a review for
8131334: SAAJ Plugability Layer: using java.util.ServiceLoader
It is about changes in
Hi,
Overall it looks ok,
I would however suggest adding a couple of tests to the jdk that run with/out a
security manager as a sanity check.
Best
Lance
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Not sure exactly what you want to set, but you can set system properties or run
tests from a script or from testNG
For running a script, see http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/vmoptions.html
Best
Lance
On Nov 12, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Miroslav Kos wrote:
> I have a set of
I have a set of tests in standalone project (using bash scripts), but
the problem is that to test the correct behavior, configuring of jdk is
necessary (property file) - have no idea if something like this is
possible with jtreg - are there any similat tests already?
Thanks
Miran
On 12/11/15
Ping ... Would somebody find time for this one?
Thanks
M.
On 26/10/15 13:59, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'd like to ask you for a review for
8131334: SAAJ Plugability Layer: using java.util.ServiceLoader
It is about changes in pluggability layer - there was a proprietary
service
Hi everybody,
I'd like to ask you for a review for
8131334: SAAJ Plugability Layer: using java.util.ServiceLoader
It is about changes in pluggability layer - there was a proprietary
service loading implementation which was not fully compatible with to
use java.util.ServiceLoader facility.
14 matches
Mail list logo