Hi Doug,
On 06/19/2014 02:02 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 06/19/2014 04:48 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the seeder
sequence
for the initial value of secondary seed and avoid interaction with
TLR's main
seed/probe:
Thanks! Or better, just use
On 06/19/2014 04:48 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the seeder sequence
for the initial value of secondary seed and avoid interaction with TLR's main
seed/probe:
Thanks! Or better, just use mix32:
+if ((r =
