On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 21:18:12 GMT, Victor Dyakov wrote:
> it requires @alexeysemenyukoracle review (owner of JDK-8274856 changeset)
Well, this looks trivial to me. Should we really wait @alexeysemenyukoracle,
who, I assume, might be on NY holiday break?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.jav
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with older
GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones, probably
through the transitive include somewhere.
Additional testing:
- [x] Linux
