On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:23:25 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> I've taken up the (bad?) habit of creating it manually to keep a tab on my
> current tasks and intents.
I do that too in some cases, and for the same reason. The only potential
downside is if you create a concrete version for a specific
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:14:05 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> LGTM
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> (This a backport but is using the mainline bug number; already resolved).
>>
>> I think that's intentional? I entered "Backport COMMITHASH" as the PR
>> subject as per instructions and the bots have taken t
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:05:42 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> > (This a backport but is using the mainline bug number; already resolved).
>
> I think that's intentional? I entered "Backport COMMITHASH" as the PR subject
> as per instructions and the bots have taken things from there.
Yes, it's bot
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:56:50 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> LGTM
Thanks!
> (This a backport but is using the mainline bug number; already resolved).
I think that's intentional? I entered "Backport COMMITHASH" as the PR subject
as per instructions and the bots have taken things from there.
---
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:46:53 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> 8279833: Loop optimization issue in String.encodeUTF8_UTF16
LGTM
(This a backport but is using the mainline bug number; already resolved).
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18/pu
8279833: Loop optimization issue in String.encodeUTF8_UTF16
-
Commit messages:
- 8279833: Loop optimization issue in String.encodeUTF8_UTF16
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18/pull/99/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk18&pr=99&range=00
Issue: https:
