> On 16 Aug 2016, at 20:08, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>
> Hello, Paul!
>
> Thank you. Here's issue:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164189
> And webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tvaleev/webrev/8164189/r1/
>
Thanks will push today or tomorrow,
Paul.
> With best regards,
> Tagir
Hello, Paul!
Thank you. Here's issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164189
And webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tvaleev/webrev/8164189/r1/
With best regards,
Tagir Valeev.
PS> Hi Tagir,
PS> I like it. Please open an issue and i will sponsor the fix for you.
PS> Thanks,
PS> Paul.
Hi Tagir,
I like it. Please open an issue and i will sponsor the fix for you.
Thanks,
Paul.
> On 8 Aug 2016, at 22:31, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to propose a simple performance patch for Collectors.toSet():
>
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collector
On 08/09/2016 10:19 AM, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
> AS> Good trick, but does it work properly with the sets that care about the
> AS> add order, e.g. LinkedHashSet? I guess our saving grace here is
> AS> Collector.toSet() is declared UNORDERED, so we can disturb the encounter
> AS> order without viola
Hello, Aleksey!
Thank you for review.
AS> Good trick, but does it work properly with the sets that care about the
AS> add order, e.g. LinkedHashSet? I guess our saving grace here is
AS> Collector.toSet() is declared UNORDERED, so we can disturb the encounter
AS> order without violating the API co
On 08/09/2016 08:31 AM, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java Tue
> Aug 02 07:19:06 2016 +0530
> +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java Tue
> Aug 09 11:47:20 2016 +0700
> @@ -295,7 +295,12 @@
> public
Hello!
I'd like to propose a simple performance patch for Collectors.toSet():
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java Tue Aug
02 07:19:06 2016 +0530
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java Tue Aug
09 11:47:20 2016 +0700
@@ -295,7 +