On 09/21/2013 11:32 PM, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
No, you can add methods to one value of an enum using the anonymous class
syntax.
Thanks for pointing this out. This is something that can be clarified
in javadoc.
Though
On 9/22/2013 5:17 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
I fail to see a problem here. In fact this is a good case why such
method is necessary - if generics get reified in Java 9 and designers
of EnumSet decide to remove redundant elementType field, all software
depending on existence of this field will break.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
There is a lot of code that cast to T or to EnumSetT that will start to
fail at runtime if generics are reified.
Yes, but how is that relevant ? Most of the code using reflection or
unchecked casts will likely fail if
Third party serialization libraries and other tools need to know the
type of EnumSet elementType. Currently this field is package-private
and said libraries have to resort to non-portable reflection hacks.
Please add EnumSet#getElementType() and EnumMap#getKeyType() methods.
I've submitted this
Hi Marcin,
your issue is here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024037
try the new JDK bug system ;-)
Andreas
On 21.09.2013 17:27, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
Third party serialization libraries and other tools need to know the
type of EnumSet elementType. Currently this field is
Nice, are submissions converted automatically ? Still it's basically
useless for outsiders - there is no public registration and without it
I can't create new issues, add comment or even watch existing issues.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Rieber rieberandr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 09/21/2013 05:27 PM, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
Third party serialization libraries and other tools need to know the
type of EnumSet elementType. Currently this field is package-private
and said libraries have to resort to non-portable reflection hacks.
Please add EnumSet#getElementType() and
First of all EnumSet/EnumMap are not general purpose collections, they
are already implementation specific.
Also, since you can't subclass enum, class of contained values will be
the same as declaring class.
From EnumSet documentation: All of the elements in an enum set must
come from a single
On 09/21/2013 08:43 PM, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
First of all EnumSet/EnumMap are not general purpose collections, they
are already implementation specific.
Also, since you can't subclass enum, class of contained values will be
the same as declaring class.
From EnumSet documentation: All of the
On 9/21/2013 11:43 AM, Marcin Wiśnicki wrote:
First of all EnumSet/EnumMap are not general purpose collections, they
are already implementation specific.
Also, since you can't subclass enum, class of contained values will be
the same as declaring class.
No, not necessarily.
Specialized enum
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
No, you can add methods to one value of an enum using the anonymous class
syntax.
Thanks for pointing this out. This is something that can be clarified
in javadoc.
Though javadocs of existing factory methods of EnumSet are
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Marcin Wiśnicki mwisni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
No, you can add methods to one value of an enum using the anonymous class
syntax.
Thanks for pointing this out. This is something that can be
FWIW, I'm surprised that these methods don't exist. I've not hit the
problem myself but I know I'd curse if I discovered their absence.
Stephen
On 21 Sep 2013 08:35, Marcin Wiśnicki mwisni...@gmail.com wrote:
Third party serialization libraries and other tools need to know the
type of EnumSet
13 matches
Mail list logo
