Thanks, Alan.
On 06/06/13 09:22, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 14:07, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review this simple patch that removes setProtectionDomain0 from
>> java.lang.Class. This is part of a two-stage process to remove the
>> function from the JVM as well.
>>
>> Thi
Changeset: 37aa82c52317
Author:emc
Date: 2013-06-06 09:51 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/37aa82c52317
8016019: Remove setProtectionDomain0 and JVM_SetProtectionDomain in JDK
Summary: setProtectionDomain0 and JVM_SetProtectionDomain are unused since at
least 1
On 06/06/2013 14:07, Eric McCorkle wrote:
Hello,
Please review this simple patch that removes setProtectionDomain0 from
java.lang.Class. This is part of a two-stage process to remove the
function from the JVM as well.
This method is not used, and has not been used in some time (at least
before
Hello,
Please review this simple patch that removes setProtectionDomain0 from
java.lang.Class. This is part of a two-stage process to remove the
function from the JVM as well.
This method is not used, and has not been used in some time (at least
before 1.5)
The webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk
