On 18/06/2015 7:56 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Jun 17, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
I did not expect that the outer class is not set for Local and Anonymous
classes. I would have thought that the enclosing method is the only difference.
A bit of history (which can be found in the J
On Jun 17, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
> I did not expect that the outer class is not set for Local and Anonymous
> classes. I would have thought that the enclosing method is the only
> difference.
A bit of history (which can be found in the JVMS itself): The EnclosingMethod
On Jun 16, 2015, at 8:36 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2015 8:39 AM, John Rose wrote:
>> What I'm suggesting is that a BC generator might emit a zero length name for
>> a non-anon class, leading to confusion when C.isAnon is called.
>
> Is a zero-length "name" for a non-anonymous class v
Am 16.06.2015 10:40, schrieb Vladimir Ivanov:
[...]
Example:
class TopLevel {
static class Nested {}
classInner {}
void f() {
class Local {}
}
Object o = new TopLevel() {}; // anonymous
}
And here's how they look like on bytecode level.
I'll use both javap and ASM
On 17/06/2015 8:39 AM, John Rose wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that a BC generator might emit a zero length name for a
non-anon class, leading to confusion when C.isAnon is called.
Is a zero-length "name" for a non-anonymous class valid? getSimpleName()
is specified to return "" for anonymous
What I'm suggesting is that a BC generator might emit a zero length name for a
non-anon class, leading to confusion when C.isAnon is called.
– John
> On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:09 AM, Vladimir Ivanov
> wrote:
>
> John,
>
>>
>> That might be an issue here. Just as (String)null and (String)"" ar
FYI,
"Nested, Inner, Member, and Top-Level Classes"
https://blogs.oracle.com/darcy/entry/nested_inner_member_and_top
-Joe
On 6/16/2015 1:40 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Jochen,
Let me elaborate on that topic a bit.
There are 5 types of classes mentioned in JVMS:
- top-level
- neste
John,
That might be an issue here. Just as (String)null and (String)"" are distinct values in
Java, in the class file a CP ref of zero differs from a CP ref to a CONSTANT_Utf8 of the empty
string "". But the method Class.isAnonymousClass does not make a distinction between
those two cases,
Jochen,
Let me elaborate on that topic a bit.
There are 5 types of classes mentioned in JVMS:
- top-level
- nested
- inner
- local
- anonymous
Example:
class TopLevel {
static class Nested {}
classInner {}
void f() {
class Local {}
}
Object o = new TopLevel() {
On Jun 14, 2015, at 7:25 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
>
> Which reflection method are you referring to? Class.isAnonymousClass is
> defined in terms of getSimpleName():
>
> public boolean isAnonymousClass() {
>return "".equals(getSimpleName());
> }
That might be an issue here. Just as (Stri
Am 15.06.2015 18:04, schrieb Vladimir Ivanov:
[...]
In order to make the class non-anonymous again, you have to specify
inner_name_index and, optionally, outer_class_info_index.
ok... let me try to understand this better... taking this Java source
public class Test {
public static void main(S
Jochen,
plus... it would be really really nice if someone could tell me how a
non-anonymous class in a method has to look like with javap, so that I
can know from there if it is no anonymous and finally fix he flags for
Groovy's class generation.
Every entry in InnerClass attribute contains 4 f
Hi Jochen,
On 15/06/2015 3:20 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Hi all,
this mail is refering to
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032733.html
and JDK-8057919
In a groovy program
def cl = { -> '' }
assert cl.class.anonymousClass == false
the open block {->''} is compi
Hi all,
this mail is refering to
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032733.html
and JDK-8057919
In a groovy program
def cl = { -> '' }
assert cl.class.anonymousClass == false
the open block {->''} is compiled into an inner class. We had problems
with this in th
14 matches
Mail list logo
