Yes, doclint is enforcing the HTML 4.01 spec for JDK 8.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/
This is in accordance with the DOCTYPE declaration generated at the
beginning of all javadoc-generated files.
FWIW, is *always* wrong. It would signify an empty paragraph,
equivalent to .
-- Jon
On
Adding Jon Gibbons, author of doclint.
Sergey, currently doclint is enforcing the rules of HTML 4 rather than
HTML 5. At some point in the future, we may migrate to HTML 5.
-Joe
On 9/27/2013 4:08 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about of = > . Should we follow html
speci
Hello,
I have a question about of = > . Should we follow html
specification[1] here or we should always replace to ?
[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/p.html#p
see@ Tag omission
On 01.07.2013 22:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/07/2013 19:24, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Yet another found of docl
On 01/07/2013 19:24, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Yet another found of doclint fixes for review; this batch to
java.lang.instrument.
Thanks,
-Joe
This looks okay to me.
-Alan
Looks good
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 1, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yet another found of doclint fixes for review; t
Hello,
Yet another found of doclint fixes for review; this batch to
java.lang.instrument.
Thanks,
-Joe
diff -r 9eaeb1a0aa46
src/share/classes/java/lang/instrument/Instrumentation.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/instrument/Instrumentation.java Sun
Jun 30 17:15:47 2013 -0700
+++ b/src
