Hi Remi,
Thanks for the note. However, I don't plan to extend @SafeVarargs to
cover this case.
Cheers,
-Joe
On 6/25/2014 1:35 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi Joe,
Just for completeness, there is another case where @SafeVarargs is safe,
any methods of an internal class (inner class static or not)
Hi Joe,
Just for completeness, there is another case where @SafeVarargs is safe,
any methods of an internal class (inner class static or not) declared
private that is not overridden.
because the internal class is private, the compiler can easily check all
possible subclasses in the compilatio
On 06/24/2014 10:43 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
Will there be another ticket to update the section (9.6.4.7.) in JLS 9?
JDK-8047159: 9.6.4.7: Allow @SafeVarargs on private methods
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047159
Cheers,
-Joe
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:
Will there be another ticket to update the section (9.6.4.7.) in JLS 9?
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Lance Andersen
wrote:
> +1
> On Jun 24, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please review the libraries update portion of allowing @SafeVarargs on
> priv
+1
On Jun 24, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review the libraries update portion of allowing @SafeVarargs on
> private instance methods:
>
>JDK-8048014: Update java.lang.SafeVararags for private methods
>
> The patch is
>
> diff -r 6c26f18d9bc0 src/share/classes/j
Hello,
Please review the libraries update portion of allowing @SafeVarargs on
private instance methods:
JDK-8048014: Update java.lang.SafeVararags for private methods
The patch is
diff -r 6c26f18d9bc0 src/share/classes/java/lang/SafeVarargs.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/SafeVara
