ommitter
> Bremen, Germany
> http://lucene.apache.org/
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uschind...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 11:55 AM
>> To: 'Remi Forax'
>> Cc: 'Michael Haupt' ; 'Core-Libs-Dev
To: Uwe Schindler
>> Cc: Michael Haupt ; Core-Libs-Dev > d...@openjdk.java.net>
>> Subject: Re: MethodHandle for array length
>>
>> Hi Uwe,
>> I was planning to add a bug for this feature but it seems that Michael was
>> faster than me,
>> https://b
el Haupt' ; 'Core-Libs-Dev' d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: RE: MethodHandle for array length
>
> Hi,
>
> OK, thanks for creating an issue!
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> uschind...@apache.org
> ASF Member, Apache Lucene PMC / Committer
> Breme
> To: Uwe Schindler
> Cc: Michael Haupt ; Core-Libs-Dev d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: MethodHandle for array length
>
> Hi Uwe,
> I was planning to add a bug for this feature but it seems that Michael was
> faster than me,
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/bro
;
> Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Mai 2016 14:34:34
> Objet: RE: MethodHandle for array length
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > > Am 11.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Uwe Schindler :
> > > With Java 9 this gets a bit worse: There is no "easy way" with the
> > Metho
Hi Michael,
> > Am 11.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Uwe Schindler :
> > With Java 9 this gets a bit worse: There is no "easy way" with the
> MethodHanldes class to generate a MethodHandles.countedLoop() on all
> elements of an array:
> >
> > public static MethodHandle countedLoop(MethodHandle iteratio
-
Uwe Schindler
uschind...@apache.org
ASF Member, Apache Lucene PMC / Committer
Bremen, Germany
http://lucene.apache.org/
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:szege...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 11:37 AM
To: Uwe Schindler
Cc: Core-Libs-Dev
Subject: Re: MethodHandle for array
Hi Uwe,
> Am 11.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Uwe Schindler :
> With Java 9 this gets a bit worse: There is no "easy way" with the
> MethodHanldes class to generate a MethodHandles.countedLoop() on all elements
> of an array:
>
> public static MethodHandle countedLoop(MethodHandle iterations, Method
Hi Uwe,
If you’re targetting JDK 9 only, you could also consider basing your language’s
dynamic operations on Dynalink; it’s integrated into JDK 9 and is specifically
meant as a way to ease implementation of languages that have dynamic types. It
happens to have a predefined GET_LENGTH[1] operat
Hi Remi,
> > while working and trying the new JDK9 MethodHandles features like
> > MethodHandles#countedLoop, I recognized a API inconsistency problem
> with it.
> >
> > We also found this while implementing the "Painless" scripting language for
> > Elasticsearch (see https://goo.gl/DbOzjC)! Painl
- Mail original -
> De: "Uwe Schindler"
> À: "Core-Libs-Dev"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 11 Mai 2016 21:35:32
> Objet: MethodHandle for array length
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Uwe,
> while working and trying the new JDK9 MethodHandles features like
>
Hi,
while working and trying the new JDK9 MethodHandles features like
MethodHandles#countedLoop, I recognized a API inconsistency problem with it.
We also found this while implementing the "Painless" scripting language for
Elasticsearch (see https://goo.gl/DbOzjC)! Painless is a very limited sc
12 matches
Mail list logo
