Subject: Re: RFR(M):8167065: Add intrinsic support for double precision
shifting on x86_64
We missed AOT and JVMCI (in HS) changes similar for Base64 [1] to record
StubRoutines pointers:
StubRoutines::_bigIntegerRightShiftWorker
StubRoutines::_bigIntegerLeftShiftWorker
Smita>>>done
, December 19, 2019 5:17 PM
To: Kamath, Smita
Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya ; 'hotspot compiler'
Subject: Re: RFR(M):8167065: Add intrinsic support for double precision
shifting on x86_64
We missed AOT and JVMCI (in HS) changes similar for Base64 [1] to record
StubRoutines pointers:
S
; 'hotspot compiler'
Subject: Re: RFR(M):8167065: Add intrinsic support for double precision
shifting on x86_64
We missed AOT and JVMCI (in HS) changes similar for Base64 [1] to record
StubRoutines pointers:
StubRoutines::_bigIntegerRightShiftWorker
StubRoutines::_bigIntegerLeftShif
ations ( please look at the email below).
>>> Link to the updated webrev:
>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~svkamath/bigIntegerShift/webrev02/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Smita
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-
>>> From: Vladimir Kozlov
>>&
On 20/12/2019 22:19, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
We should have added core-libs to review since you modified
BigInteger.java.
This adds Objects.checkFromToIndex checks in the middle of several
supporting methods. Is IOOBE really possible in these cases or are these
stand in for always-on asserts t
, Smita
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'hotspot compiler'
Subject: Re: RFR(M):8167065: Add intrinsic support for double precision
shifting on x86_64
On 20/12/2019 22:19, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> We should have added core-libs to review since you modified
> BigInteger.j
