> On 28 maj 2015, at 20:06, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>
> On 05/28/2015 07:35 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>> Hi Mandy,
>>
>> On 05/27/2015 03:32 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>> Taking it further - is it simpler to return String[] of all classnames
>>> including the duplicated ones and have the VM do the co
On 05/28/2015 07:35 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Mandy,
On 05/27/2015 03:32 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Taking it further - is it simpler to return String[] of all
classnames including the duplicated ones and have the VM do the
count? Are you concerned with the size of the String[]?
Yes, the hist
Hi Mandy,
On 05/27/2015 03:32 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On May 27, 2015, at 12:34 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
The jdk part looks OK (no great changes on this side from last webrev). Is there a
particular reason why the return type of printFinalizayionQueue() method is Object[]
and not M
> On May 27, 2015, at 12:34 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> The jdk part looks OK (no great changes on this side from last webrev). Is
> there a particular reason why the return type of printFinalizayionQueue()
> method is Object[] and not Map.Entry[] ?
>
Taking it further - is i
Hi Dmitry,
The jdk part looks OK (no great changes on this side from last webrev).
Is there a particular reason why the return type of
printFinalizayionQueue() method is Object[] and not Map.Entryint[]>[] ?
For the hotspot part, I have a few reservations. You expect that the
type of array el
On 5/26/15 10:16 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Hi Everybody,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059036/webrev.09/
Please review updated webrev -
printFinalizationQueue now returns and array of Map.Entry
Hi Dmitry,
I looked at the jdk_webrev. Everything looks great except the spacing
Hi Everybody,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8059036/webrev.09/
Please review updated webrev -
printFinalizationQueue now returns and array of Map.Entry
>> On May 19, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Dmitry Samersoff
>> mailto:dmitry.samers...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Other alternatives could be