Looks good.
/Erik
On 2020-02-13 10:08, Igor Ignatev wrote:
Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and
apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with version field
value being the only
+1 for the change to test/jaxp/TEST.ROOT.
Best,
Joe
On 2/13/20 10:08 AM, Igor Ignatev wrote:
Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and
apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with
Oh, I’m sorry I actually changed it to 5.0 when were (re)doing testing, and
apparently forgot to replace the webrev, the right is
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.01 ; with version field
value being the only difference b/w .00 and .01
Thanks,
— Igor
> On Feb 13, 2020, at
Looks good, but could you change the "version" field to "5.0", it should
work now.
/Erik
On 2020-02-13 08:50, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.00
10 lines changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 9 mod;
Hi all,
could you please review the patch which changes jtreg
Igor,
The change to langtools/TEST.ROOT is OK.
That being said, there are some old entries there which could also be
cleaned up (separately?) These lines probably date from the development
of JDK 9 and the evolution of Project Jigsaw.
20 # Use new module options
21
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8238943/webrev.00
> 10 lines changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 9 mod;
Hi all,
could you please review the patch which changes jtreg version used in jdk/jdk
to the latest and greatest -- jtreg 5.0? and as (recently became) usually, this
patch also bumps
