> On Jan 28, 2016, at 8:51 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> 2016/1/28 8:12 -0800, Gil Tene :
>> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:41 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2016 11:31 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Earlier there was a discussion on this mail alias about the spin loop
hint proposal [1]
2016/1/28 8:12 -0800, Gil Tene :
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:41 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 27/01/2016 11:31 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>>> Earlier there was a discussion on this mail alias about the spin loop
>>> hint proposal [1]. Based on the feedback from that discussion some
>>> changes were incorp
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:41 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> HI Ivan,
>
> On 27/01/2016 11:31 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Earlier there was a discussion on this mail alias about the spin loop
>> hint proposal [1]. Based on the feedback from that discussion some
>> changes were incorporate
HI Ivan,
On 27/01/2016 11:31 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Hello,
Earlier there was a discussion on this mail alias about the spin loop
hint proposal [1]. Based on the feedback from that discussion some
changes were incorporated and the JEP has been filed [2]. There seems to
be a consensus on the API
Updated to http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/8147844.jdk.02/
The sample JavaDoc has been updated too:
http://ivankrylov.github.io/onspinwait/api/java/lang/Runtime.html#onSpinWait--
Alan, Thank you.
On 27/01/2016 18:20, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/01/2016 14:10, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Indeed, t
On 27/01/2016 14:10, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Indeed, thanks!
New webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/8147844.jdk.01/
Can you add @since 9 too?
-Alan.
Indeed, thanks!
New webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/8147844.jdk.01/
On 27/01/2016 16:48, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Please review the upcoming API changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/8147844.jdk.00/
I think the semicolon at the end of the line 887 is not needed, e.g:
Hi Ivan,
> Please review the upcoming API changes:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ikrylov/8147844.jdk.00/
I think the semicolon at the end of the line 887 is not needed, e.g:
887 public static void onSpinWait() {};
should be
887 public static void onSpinWait() {}
Best regards,
Andrej G
Hello,
Earlier there was a discussion on this mail alias about the spin loop
hint proposal [1]. Based on the feedback from that discussion some
changes were incorporated and the JEP has been filed [2]. There seems to
be a consensus on the API side. The JEP is now in a draft state and I
hope t
