+1
On 30/10/2018 07:05, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Seems fine and trivial.
Regards, Thomas
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:56 PM Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following tiny change which fixes
the license header on a few AIX-specific files:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~si
Thanks for the quick reviews!
Volker
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:35 PM Roger Riggs wrote:
>
> Looks fine, Reviewed.
>
> Thanks, Roger
>
> On 10/30/2018 11:02 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> > Hi Volker, looks good (not a Reviewer however) !
> > Maybe you should also adjust the Copyright year info
Looks fine, Reviewed.
Thanks, Roger
On 10/30/2018 11:02 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hi Volker, looks good (not a Reviewer however) !
Maybe you should also adjust the Copyright year info in the files you touched .
Best regards, Matthias
-Original Message-
Hi,
can I please have
Hi Volker, looks good (not a Reviewer however) !
Maybe you should also adjust the Copyright year info in the files you touched .
Best regards, Matthias
-Original Message-
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following tiny change which fixes
the license header on a few AIX-specifi
Seems fine and trivial.
Regards, Thomas
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:56 PM Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can I please have a review for the following tiny change which fixes
> the license header on a few AIX-specific files:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8213151/
> https:/
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following tiny change which fixes
the license header on a few AIX-specific files:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8213151/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213151
These files have been wrongly integrated (without the Classpath
Exce