Re: RFR(XS) 8148785: Update class file version to 53 for JDK-9

Hi Alan, Thanks for looking at the change. I'll drop the comment before checking it in. Harold On 2/3/2016 9:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/02/2016 14:12, harold seigel wrote: Hi Aleksey, Thanks for the review. The plan is to first change the runtime to accept version 53 files and

Re: RFR(XS) 8148785: Update class file version to 53 for JDK-9

On 03/02/2016 14:12, harold seigel wrote: Hi Aleksey, Thanks for the review. The plan is to first change the runtime to accept version 53 files and then change the tools to generate them. Hopefully, this will reduce incompatibility problems. See JDK-8148651

Re: RFR(XS) 8148785: Update class file version to 53 for JDK-9

Hi Aleksey, Thanks for the review. The plan is to first change the runtime to accept version 53 files and then change the tools to generate them. Hopefully, this will reduce incompatibility problems. See JDK-8148651 for details. Thanks, Ha

Re: RFR(XS) 8148785: Update class file version to 53 for JDK-9

On 02/03/2016 04:16 PM, harold seigel wrote: > Open webrevs: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8148785.jdk/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8148785.hs/ +1 > JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148785 Description seems to imply we change the compiled c

RFR(XS) 8148785: Update class file version to 53 for JDK-9

Hi, Please review this small change to fix bug 8148785. The fix bumps the class file version to 53 for JDK-9. Open webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8148785.jdk/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8148785.hs/ JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8