Thanks David!
Then test will be excluded for now for jdk8u on compact1 and compact2
profiles.
Sincerely yours,
Ivan
On 30.06.2015 8:56, David Holmes wrote:
On 25/06/2015 8:29 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi David!
The test fails when reading content of existing jsse.jar, which belongs
to comp
On 25/06/2015 8:29 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi David!
The test fails when reading content of existing jsse.jar, which belongs
to compact3 profile.
When the test loads classes from this jar and tries to access their
fields, it hits the types that are not included in compact[12], thus
NoClassDefF
On 25/06/2015 14:08, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Yes. This is it!
Would it make sense then to simply skip jsse.jar when executing the
test in compact[12]?
I guess It should be possible to determine that by checking the
properties profile.compact1 and profile.compact2 aren't nulls.
There aren't any
On 25.06.2015 15:58, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/06/2015 11:29, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi David!
The test fails when reading content of existing jsse.jar, which
belongs to compact3 profile.
When the test loads classes from this jar and tries to access their
fields, it hits the types that are
On 25/06/2015 11:29, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi David!
The test fails when reading content of existing jsse.jar, which
belongs to compact3 profile.
When the test loads classes from this jar and tries to access their
fields, it hits the types that are not included in compact[12], thus
NoClassD
Hi David!
The test fails when reading content of existing jsse.jar, which belongs
to compact3 profile.
When the test loads classes from this jar and tries to access their
fields, it hits the types that are not included in compact[12], thus
NoClassDefFoundError.
I'm not certain, if it is a bu
Hi Ivan,
On 25/06/2015 4:11 AM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
This test fails when running on compact1 and compact2, since it tries to
access all the jars from "sun.boot.class.path".
The easiest approach would be to include it in the group, which requires
at least compact3.
Easy yes but is it
Thanks Seán!
Added 9-na and noreg labels.
Sincerely yours,
Ivan
On 24.06.2015 23:47, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks ok to me Ivan. Is this required for JDK 9 also ? If not, please
add 9-na label.
Approved.
Regards,
Sean.
On 24/06/2015 19:11, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
This test fails when ru
Looks ok to me Ivan. Is this required for JDK 9 also ? If not, please
add 9-na label.
Approved.
Regards,
Sean.
On 24/06/2015 19:11, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
This test fails when running on compact1 and compact2, since it tries
to access all the jars from "sun.boot.class.path".
The easie
Hello!
This test fails when running on compact1 and compact2, since it tries to
access all the jars from "sun.boot.class.path".
The easiest approach would be to include it in the group, which requires
at least compact3.
BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080524
WEBREV: http://c
10 matches
Mail list logo
