With the previous comments in mind, looks OK to me.
Darryl
On 10/21/2013 07:07 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this small spec change to deprecate some obsolete RMI
APIs, along with a bit of associated cleanup. There are no functional
changes in this changeset.
Bug:
http
Hi Daniel,
Yes, this round is just deprecation, not removal, so anything that uses
RMISecurityManager can continue to do so for the near future.
Ideally we should remove all references to RMISecurityManager from the JDK, but
this can be done later. The only cost is some deprecation warnings.
On 10/22/13 5:18 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/10/2013 03:07, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this small spec change to deprecate some obsolete RMI APIs,
along with a bit of associated cleanup. There are no functional changes in
this changeset.
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net
Hi Stuart,
This looks good to me.
RMISecurityManager:
I see that there are a few places in the JDK where we still
instantiate an RMISecurityManager.
I assume we must unfortunately keep them for backward compatibility,
in case some application code would try to downcast
System.getSecurityManage
On 22/10/2013 03:07, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this small spec change to deprecate some obsolete RMI
APIs, along with a bit of associated cleanup. There are no functional
changes in this changeset.
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026427
Webrev:
http:
Hi all,
Please review this small spec change to deprecate some obsolete RMI APIs, along
with a bit of associated cleanup. There are no functional changes in this changeset.
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026427
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/80264
