On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:36:20 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>>
>> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This
>> does affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify
>>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:11:04 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> non-serializable classes => non-serializable superclasses
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Serializable.java li
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> text, not to make any semantic changes. Thus, a CSR reque
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
text, not to make any semantic changes. Thus, a CSR request shouldn
