Thanks, Daniel.
I only gave it a quick look, but Looks Good To Me.
Thanks Roger.
Here is an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8153666/webrev.01
best regards,
-- daniel
On 08/06/16 15:56, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1
On 6/8/2016 10:37 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 08/06/16 15:35, Roger Riggs wrote:
Yes, I would update the spec to the new b
Looks good,
Thanks, Roger
On 6/8/2016 11:47 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Thanks Roger.
Here is an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8153666/webrev.01
best regards,
-- daniel
On 08/06/16 15:56, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1
On 6/8/2016 10:37 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 08/06
Thanks Roger.
Here is an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8153666/webrev.01
best regards,
-- daniel
On 08/06/16 15:56, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1
On 6/8/2016 10:37 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 08/06/16 15:35, Roger Riggs wrote:
Yes, I would update the spec to the new b
+1
On 6/8/2016 10:37 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 08/06/16 15:35, Roger Riggs wrote:
Yes, I would update the spec to the new behavior.
What about:
* Otherwise, if the string contains {@code "{"}
* where {@code } is in {@code [0-9]}
* then java.text.MessageFormat is used
On 08/06/16 15:35, Roger Riggs wrote:
Yes, I would update the spec to the new behavior.
What about:
* Otherwise, if the string contains {@code "{"}
* where {@code } is in {@code [0-9]}
* then java.text.MessageFormat is used to format the string.
-- daniel
On 6/8/20
Yes, I would update the spec to the new behavior.
On 6/8/2016 10:31 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Good point Roger!
I was already wondering whether looking for {[0-9] instead
of {[0-3] deserved a small mention in the release note.
The fact that the spec needs updating confirms that this
little beh
Good point Roger!
I was already wondering whether looking for {[0-9] instead
of {[0-3] deserved a small mention in the release note.
The fact that the spec needs updating confirms that this
little behavior change probably needs to be mentioned.
I will do the paperwork for the spec change.
I do
Hi Daniel,
Looks ok, but...
Formatter.java:
- line 104: the javadoc says it looks for '{0' but the implementation
looks for '{'[0..9]
It looks like the spec is out of sync with the implementation (the
implementation is more lenient)
and has been for a while.
According to the spec/jav
Hi,
Please find below a patch for a small optimization
in Formatter.formatMessage.
This patch also removed the synchronized keyword which
was there for historical reasons - but which has
become needless.
More background available at:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153666
(thanks Marti
10 matches
Mail list logo
