Hi Jon,
Thank you for the explanation. Makes sense. No worries :-)
Best
Lance
> On May 16, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> wrote:
>
> Lance,
>
> The name seemed unnecessary given the context of the method associated with
> the doc comment (i.e getNamespaceURI) and the preceding senten
Lance,
The name seemed unnecessary given the context of the method associated
with the doc comment (i.e getNamespaceURI) and the preceding sentence:
>> the following table describes the returned Namespace URI value for
all possible prefix values:
If that was editorial overreach, I apologise
Hi Jon,
Looks good. Thanks again!
-Joe
On 5/16/2017 3:27 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Please review these fixes to update the public doc comments in the
java.xml
module for HTML 5.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/8180385/webrev.02/
API: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/8180385/api.02/
Hi Jon
src/java.xml/share/classes/javax/xml/namespace/NamespaceContext.java - Was
there a reason you omitted {@code getNamespaceURI(prefix)} when creating the
caption?
Looks pretty good otherwise
> On May 16, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> wrote:
>
> Please review these fixes to upd
Please review these fixes to update the public doc comments in the java.xml
module for HTML 5.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/8180385/webrev.02/
API: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/8180385/api.02/
-- Jon
