Hi Severin, makes sense !
Maybe you could adjust the comment and add a bit of info about this .
I do not need to see a new webrev .
Best regards, Matthias
>
> What you are seeing here is a hybrid system[1]. My workstation is
> hybrid as well. Legacy and hybrid systems are being detected as c
Hi Matthias,
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 14:01 +, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> Hi Severin, 8239559/02 looks generally good .
Thanks for the review!
> However I wonder about this :
>
> I have a SLES15 aarch64 system with these settings :
>
> more /proc/cgroups
> #subsys_name hierarchy
Hi Severin, 8239559/02 looks generally good .
However I wonder about this :
I have a SLES15 aarch64 system with these settings :
more /proc/cgroups
#subsys_namehierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 6 1 1
cpu 8 1 1
cpuacct 8 1 1
blkio
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:28 -0500, Bob Vandette wrote:
> > > If you don’t have access to the information required to get metrics, I
> > > just assumed that
> > > you would return NULL in CgroupSubsystemFactory.create() rather than
> > > making the
> > > assumption that it works only to fail later
Hi, regarding RHEL 6 this webpage says it is not supported, only on RHEL 7
+ .
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1378023
Regarding SUSE Linux (SLES) we run docker on SLES12 and higher ( I don't
think docker is supported on SLES11 but not 100% sure ).
Best regards, Matthias
> >
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 5:36 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> Note: I've changed the bug title to be version-less. This is really an
> issue in the detection logic irrespective of cgroup version in use.
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Bob Vandette wrote:
>>> On Feb 21, 2020, a
Hi Bob,
Note: I've changed the bug title to be version-less. This is really an
issue in the detection logic irrespective of cgroup version in use.
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Bob Vandette wrote:
> > On Feb 21, 2020, at 9:30 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > On Fri, 2020
