Re: RFR: 8256018: Adler32/CRC32/CRC32C missing reachabilityFence [v2]

2022-03-09 Thread Volker Simonis
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:58:08 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review the fix for JDK-8256018 which addresses the issue that the >> update(ByteBuffer) methods of Adler32, CRC32, and CRC32C should use >> Reference.reachabilityFence to ensure that direct byte buffer are kept kept

Re: RFR: 8256018: Adler32/CRC32/CRC32C missing reachabilityFence [v2]

2020-11-11 Thread Naoto Sato
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:58:08 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review the fix for JDK-8256018 which addresses the issue that the >> update(ByteBuffer) methods of Adler32, CRC32, and CRC32C should use >> Reference.reachabilityFence to ensure that direct byte buffer are kept kept

Re: RFR: 8256018: Adler32/CRC32/CRC32C missing reachabilityFence [v2]

2020-11-11 Thread Lance Andersen
> Hi, > > Please review the fix for JDK-8256018 which addresses the issue that the > update(ByteBuffer) methods of Adler32, CRC32, and CRC32C should use > Reference.reachabilityFence to ensure that direct byte buffer are kept kept > alive when they are accessed directly. > > The Mach5 jdk-t