Re: RFR: 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now" [v3]

2021-02-28 Thread Attila Szegedi
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 07:20:19 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous >> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences >> compared to the previous content of the PR. > >

Re: RFR: 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now" [v3]

2021-02-27 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:01:10 GMT, Attila Szegedi wrote: >> 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with >> "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now" > > Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous > commits have been

Re: RFR: 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now" [v3]

2021-02-27 Thread Attila Szegedi
> 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with > "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now" Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to