> I decided to show a complete static method in the example, so it could be
> copied to user utility class as is. Not sure if it's reasonable to add
> `assert cls.isRecord();` there. Also I don't know whether there's a
> limitation on max characters in the sample code. Probable a line break in
> `static <T extends Record>\nConstructor<T> getCanonicalConstructor(Class<T>
> cls)` is unnecessary.
>
> ---
> Aside from this PR, I've found a couple of things to clean up in
> `java.lang.Class`:
> 1. There's erroneous JavaDoc link in `getSimpleName()` JavaDoc (introduced by
> @jddarcy in #3038). It should be `#isArray()` instead of `isArray()`.
> 2. Methods Atomic::casAnnotationType and Atomic::casAnnotationData have
> unused type parameters `<T>`.
> 3. Probably too much but AnnotationData can be nicely converted to a record!
> Not sure, probably nobody wants to have `java.lang.Record` initialized too
> early or increasing the footprint of such a basic class in the metaspace, so
> I don't insist on this.
>
>
> private record AnnotationData(
> Map<Class<? extends Annotation>, Annotation> annotations,
> Map<Class<? extends Annotation>, Annotation> declaredAnnotations,
> // Value of classRedefinedCount when we created this AnnotationData
> instance
> int redefinedCount) {
> }
>
>
> Please tell me if it's ok to fix 1 and 2 along with this PR.
Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Use @apiNote; this method -> the following method
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3556/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3556/files/1133ab7d..86cac681
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3556&range=02
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3556&range=01-02
Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3556.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3556/head:pull/3556
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3556
