Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
The test was failed by:
Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
was applied.
JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
test.nativepath val
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:17:59 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
>
> t
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:20:25 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:20:25 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:20:25 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
>
> t
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:10:28 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use expectedLibpath
>
> For my curiosity, how is AIX different from other Linux in that the
> test.nativepath is n
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:14:44 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> For my curiosity, how is AIX different from other Linux in that the
>> test.nativepath is not/should not be in LIBPATH?
>
> @RogerRiggs
> Many thanks. that's good point.
> Only 1st part has `test.nativepath` because of following cod
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:46:28 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
>
> t
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:44:07 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> @RogerRiggs
>> Many thanks. that's good point.
>> Only 1st part has `test.nativepath` because of following code.
>>
>> if (AIX.is()) {
>> pb.environment().put("LIBPATH", libpath);
>> }
>>
>> On current condition, parent (main) proces
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 19:59:46 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The changes seem ok, modifying both the LIBPATH passed in the environment and
> the expected re
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:16:42 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> If its the former, then the issue is that `libpath` is just outdated when we
> get around to use it? In that case, why not just re-aquiring LIBPATH when
> building up `expected`?
^This was my thought at first as well :-) but in my invest
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:01:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> Javac is compiling the source to a .class file. The contents of the
> `java.library.path` do no
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:01:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Javac is compiling the source to a .class file. The contents of the
> `java.library.path` do not affect the class file generated. None of the code
> of the class is executed during compilation.
Yup. Not the best snippet to include. It is s
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH base
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH base
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:51:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> The piece I was missing is that the HotSpot AIX specific code, computes and
> sets LIBPATH base
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
How about excluding the test from running on AIX?
-Joe
On 2/25/2022 7:07 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
The test was failed by:
Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
A
IMHO this is not hard to fix (we already have multiple proposals) and we'd
should have this test on AIX too.
Cheers, Thomas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 6:23 PM Joe Darcy wrote:
> How about excluding the test from running on AIX?
>
> -Joe
>
> On 2/25/2022 7:07 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 F
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:49:22 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
> The test was failed by:
> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>
> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following change
> was applied.
> JDK-8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
>
> t
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:03:19 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add null check
>
> My preference is to pass the unmodified LIBPATH in the environment in each of
> the three cases
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 17:45:39 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
>> Run jtreg:jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java on AIX.
>> The test was failed by:
>> Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs
>>
>> According to my investigation, this issue was happened after following
>> change was ap
34 matches
Mail list logo
