On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:32:06 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
> My suggestion is to keep the -ve path assembly optimization in this patch.
> When the optimization in IR is introduced, the assembly could then be
> simplified as suggested by @merykitty.
Okay. Lets do that as part of JDK-8282365.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:05:33 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Optimizes the divideUnsigned() and remainderUnsigned() methods in
>> java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long classes using x86 intrinsics. This
>> change shows 3x improvement for Integer methods and upto 25% improvement for
>>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:05:33 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Optimizes the divideUnsigned() and remainderUnsigned() methods in
>> java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long classes using x86 intrinsics. This
>> change shows 3x improvement for Integer methods and upto 25% improvement for
>>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:59:10 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
> Personally, I think the optimisation for `div < 0` should be handled by the
> mid-end optimiser, which will not only give us the advantages of dead code
> elimination, but also global code motion. I would suggest the backend only
> doing
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:05:33 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Optimizes the divideUnsigned() and remainderUnsigned() methods in
>> java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long classes using x86 intrinsics. This
>> change shows 3x improvement for Integer methods and upto 25% improvement for
>>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 01:05:33 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Optimizes the divideUnsigned() and remainderUnsigned() methods in
>> java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long classes using x86 intrinsics. This
>> change shows 3x improvement for Integer methods and upto 25% improvement for
>>
> Optimizes the divideUnsigned() and remainderUnsigned() methods in
> java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long classes using x86 intrinsics. This
> change shows 3x improvement for Integer methods and upto 25% improvement for
> Long. This change also implements the DivMod optimization which fuses
>
