On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:50:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> There is no pair of character values in the latin1 range (0-255) that will
> make the condition at line 401 in `StringLatin1.java` true, so this test can
> be removed.
>
> Added a test and a microbenchmark (which as expected sees a few
> There is no pair of character values in the latin1 range (0-255) that will
> make the condition at line 401 in `StringLatin1.java` true, so this test can
> be removed.
>
> Added a test and a microbenchmark (which as expected sees a few ns/op
> improvement from this change). Took the opportuni
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:37:32 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Nice Catch!
+1
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8292
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:50:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> There is no pair of character values in the latin1 range (0-255) that will
> make the condition at line 401 in `StringLatin1.java` true, so this test can
> be removed.
>
> Added a test and a microbenchmark (which as expected sees a few
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:50:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> There is no pair of character values in the latin1 range (0-255) that will
> make the condition at line 401 in `StringLatin1.java` true, so this test can
> be removed.
>
> Added a test and a microbenchmark (which as expected sees a few
There is no pair of character values in the latin1 range (0-255) that will make
the condition at line 401 in `StringLatin1.java` true, so this test can be
removed.
Added a test and a microbenchmark (which as expected sees a few ns/op
improvement from this change). Took the opportunity to tune t
