On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could be
migrated to `StringBuilder`.
-
Commit messages:
- [PATCH]
