Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v2]

2022-06-06 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:09:15 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> back to wait 1 second > > No, it doesn't work. You can build a fastdebug build with `configure >

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v2]

2022-06-01 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:07:16 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: >> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 >> PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in >> open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed >> test cases are

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v2]

2022-06-01 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:07:16 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: >> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 >> PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in >> open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed >> test cases are

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v2]

2022-06-01 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 > PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in > open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed > test cases are impacted. Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request