Looks fine. Is it practical to create a regression test for this case?
Mike
On Oct 14 2013, at 08:52 , Chris Hegarty wrote:
> This is a request to pull a small change to ForkJoinTask into jdk8, from the
> jsr166 CVS. This was first discussed over on c-i [1] a few weeks back.
>
> diff -r 07723
Looks good,
Paul.
On Oct 14, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> This is a request to pull a small change to ForkJoinTask into jdk8, from the
> jsr166 CVS. This was first discussed over on c-i [1] a few weeks back.
>
> diff -r 077237e4613f src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinTa
This is a request to pull a small change to ForkJoinTask into jdk8, from
the jsr166 CVS. This was first discussed over on c-i [1] a few weeks back.
diff -r 077237e4613f
src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinTask.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinTask.java Mon O
