On 5/29/2021 12:20 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
`-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code that
needs to access annotations with
On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:02:13 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
> A test could be constructed so that it would mimic the migration of an
> annotation from CLASS to RUNTIME retention
The test is ready for review in #4280 - I am closing this PR without
integration as the change of core-libs proposed here
On Mon, 31 May 2021 22:36:52 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > OTOH when CLASS retention is changing to RUNTIME, such as in this case, the
> > ways of looking up are widening (there is some new desire to lookup the
> > annotation at runtime via reflection). To facilitate that, the annotation
> > ma
On 1/06/2021 4:20 am, Peter Levart wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:37:55 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
That reads backwards to me. +PreserveAllAnnotations means that CLASS
retention annotations are retained by the VM not just RUNTIME ones. So
in that sense it might be a migration aid if moving from R
On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:37:55 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> That reads backwards to me. +PreserveAllAnnotations means that CLASS
> retention annotations are retained by the VM not just RUNTIME ones. So
> in that sense it might be a migration aid if moving from RUNTIME to
> CLASS, not CLASS to RUNTIME
On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:37:55 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > Hi Jaroslav,
> > If you change `@JavaScriptBody` retention to `RUNTIME`, you don't need to
> > re-compile any code that uses this annotation. You just have to use
> > `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` to expose all anotations to JVM and
>
On 31/05/2021 8:29 pm, Peter Levart wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
My use-case relates to
[@JavaScriptBody](https://bits.netbeans.org/html+java/1.7.1/net/java/html/js/package-summary.html)
annotation used for Java/JavaScript interop. Originally all existing
On Mon, 31 May 2021 06:06:37 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Mon, 31 May 2021 06:06:37 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> My use-case relates to
> [@JavaScriptBody](https://bits.netbeans.org/html+java/1.7.1/net/java/html/js/package-summary.html)
> annotation used for Java/JavaScript interop. Originally all existing usages
> (Post Processing Classes, Inst
On Mon, 31 May 2021 06:06:37 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Obvious suggestion is to change the `@JavaScriptBody` retention to `RUNTIME`
> - however there are plenty of libraries already compiled with the existing
> annotation and they would have to be all recompiled to new version. I'd
> rath
On 31/05/2021 4:11 pm, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 23:03:55 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
But we should add in some tests.
Right, I was surprised by missing tests as well. I've just created a
_"standalone"_ commit 0f689ea that adds such test and also shows the way I am
currently
On Mon, 31 May 2021 06:06:37 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Sun, 30 May 2021 23:03:55 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> But we should add in some tests.
Right, I was surprised by missing tests as well. I've just created a
_"standalone"_ commit 0f689ea that adds such test and also shows the way I am
currently using the `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` flag. I
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to access annotations with `RetentionPolicy.CLASS` without the
>
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to access annotations with `RetentionPolicy.CLASS` without the
>
On 31/05/2021 4:44 am, Alan Bateman wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2021 12:56:39 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
`-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be ve
On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:56:52 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:56:52 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to access annotations with `RetentionPolicy.CLASS` without the
>
On Fri, 28 May 2021 12:56:39 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to ac
On Fri, 28 May 2021 12:56:39 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to ac
On Fri, 28 May 2021 12:56:39 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to ac
This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
`-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code that
needs to access annotations with `RetentionPolicy.CLASS` without the need to
par
25 matches
Mail list logo
