On 31/05/2021 8:29 pm, Peter Levart wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
My use-case relates to
[@JavaScriptBody](https://bits.netbeans.org/html+java/1.7.1/net/java/html/js/package-summary.html)
annotation used for Java/JavaScript interop. Originally all existing
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> My use-case relates to
> [@JavaScriptBody](https://bits.netbeans.org/html+java/1.7.1/net/java/html/js/package-summary.html)
> annotation used for Java/JavaScript interop. Originally all existing usages
> (Post Processing Classes,
On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:06:49 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Obvious suggestion is to change the `@JavaScriptBody` retention to `RUNTIME`
> - however there are plenty of libraries already compiled with the existing
> annotation and they would have to be all recompiled to new version. I'd
>
On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:56:52 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:56:52 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
>> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
>> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>>
>> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
>> that needs
> This PR exposes runtime invisible annotations via `Class.getAnnotation` when
> `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option is passed to the JVM.
>
> Existing `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` option can be very useful for code
> that needs to access annotations with `RetentionPolicy.CLASS` without the
