On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:36:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
>> the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being
>> implemented. The property is unset, optional in the terminology of
>> System.getProperties,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:36:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
>> the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being
>> implemented. The property is unset, optional in the terminology of
>> System.getProperties,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:31:31 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Should this be added to the default permissions in the
> `conf/security/java.policy` file along with other similar properties?
Seems reasonable; good catch.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8437
> Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
> the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being
> implemented. The property is unset, optional in the terminology of
> System.getProperties, for an initial release of a specification.
>
> Please a
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:27:34 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
> the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being
> implemented. The property is unset, optional in the terminology of
> System.getProperties, for
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:27:34 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
> the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being
> implemented. The property is unset, optional in the terminology of
> System.getProperties, for
Add a new system property, java.specification.maintenance.version, to return
the maintenance release number of the Java SE specification being implemented.
The property is unset, optional in the terminology of System.getProperties, for
an initial release of a specification.
Please also review t
