Ok to push joe
> On May 17, 2016, at 3:37 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
>
> Thanks Lance!
>
> On 5/17/2016 11:26 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Joe
>>
>> It looks OK. The formatting is a bit off where you encased existing code
>> with new if statements so I would consider fixing that before you
Thanks Lance!
On 5/17/2016 11:26 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Joe
It looks OK. The formatting is a bit off where you encased existing
code with new if statements so I would consider fixing that before
you push
It seems it has something to do with whitespaces. I re-generated the
webrev. A
Hi Joe
It looks OK. The formatting is a bit off where you encased existing code with
new if statements so I would consider fixing that before you push
Best
Lance
> On May 17, 2016, at 12:42 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes a missing feature in CatalogUriResolver where an
Hi,
This patch fixes a missing feature in CatalogUriResolver where an uri
entry can be referenced by a publicid (urn:publicid), similar to that of
the public entry. The fix then is basically sharing the process for a
public entry.
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156845
webrev:
