l Fuchs' <daniel.fu...@oracle.com>; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: RE: RFR (JAXP) 8169827:
> > javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh copied JDK failed
> >
> > > From: Langer, Christoph [mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com]
> > > To: Fr
alog/PropertiesTest.sh copied JDK failed
>
> > From: Langer, Christoph [mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com]
> > To: Frank Yuan
> > Cc: 'Daniel Fuchs'; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: RE: RFR (JAXP) 8169827:
> javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest
> From: Langer, Christoph [mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com]
> To: Frank Yuan
> Cc: 'Daniel Fuchs'; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: RFR (JAXP) 8169827:
> javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh copied JDK failed
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> thank
;
> > Best regards
> > Christoph
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Daniel Fuchs [mailto:daniel.fu...@oracle.com]
> > > Sent: Montag, 23. Januar 2017 17:12
> > > To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; Frank Yuan
>
gt; From: Langer, Christoph [mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com]
> To: Daniel Fuchs; Frank Yuan; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: RFR (JAXP) 8169827:
> javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh copied JDK failed
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thanks for checking/re
@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP) 8169827:
> javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh copied JDK failed
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Thanks for fixing this test!
>
> I imported your patch, modified ProblemList.txt to not skip the test,
> and se
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for fixing this test!
I imported your patch, modified ProblemList.txt to not skip the test,
and sent it through our test system, and I'm happy to report that
the test was run on all available platforms with no failure.
So I think you should simply remove the line from
Hi,
while working on jaxp changes and running jtreg tests I found that test
javax/xml/jaxp/isolatedjdk/catalog/PropertiesTest.sh does not work. I then saw
that this was already reported with bug 8169827. But, as I had already spent
some time to fix this test I'd like to contribute my fix:
